From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Saeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
CASE NO. CR-S-11-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CR-S-11-501 WBS

01-24-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Lexi Negin for JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for United States DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender LEXI NEGIN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

Lexi Negin, Bar #250376

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING AND TO

EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


Judge: William B. Shubb

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER, by and through his counsel, LEXI NEGIN, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Monday, January 30, 2012, be continued to Monday, March 19, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is because additional time is needed for defense preparation and meetings between the parties with the goal being to resolve the case by way of a disposition.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 24, 2012, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, March 19, 2012, shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) &(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ____________

Lexi Negin for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for United States

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

____________

LEXI NEGIN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER

ORDER

Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on January 24, 2012, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for Monday, January 30, 2012, be vacated and that the case be set for Monday, March 19, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' January 24, 2012, stipulation, the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded during the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 24, 2012, through and including March 19, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.

____________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Saeger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
CASE NO. CR-S-11-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Saeger

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN CRAIG SAEGER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CR-S-11-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)