From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rustico

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 6, 2012
Criminal No. 07-203 (D.N.J. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 07-203

03-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT RUSTICO, Defendant, and ING DIRECT, and its successors or assigns, Garnishee.

PAUL J. FISHMAN United States Attorney LEAH A. BYNON Assistant U.S. Attorney LAB0321 (FLU:KCPB)


PAUL J. FISHMAN

United States Attorney

LEAH A. BYNON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

LAB0321

(FLU:KCPB)

Hon. Katharine S. Hayden


ORDER

This matter having been opened to the Court by the U.S. Attorney, PAUL J. FISHMAN for the District of New Jersey, on behalf of plaintiff United States of America, and for good cause shown,

It is on this 6th day of March, 2012

ORDERED that the Application and Order for Writ of Garnishment in this matter is hereby WITHDRAWN.

__________________

HON. KATHARINE S. HAYDEN

Judge, U.S. District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Rustico

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 6, 2012
Criminal No. 07-203 (D.N.J. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Rustico

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT RUSTICO, Defendant, and ING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 07-203 (D.N.J. Mar. 6, 2012)