From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Russell

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 20, 1967
371 F.2d 1016 (3d Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 16011.

Submitted February 6, 1967.

Decided February 20, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.

Edward C. Behm, pro se.

Amos Davis, Dist. Atty., Hollidaysburg, Pa., for appellee.

Before HASTIE, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The appellant, a state prisoner, has appealed from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus. His principal contention is that he pleaded guilty without the constitutionally essential benefit of counsel. With adequate justification in the record, the disputed factual issues concerning the appointment and conduct of counsel have been decided against the appellant. Accordingly, the collateral attack upon his conviction fails.

The court notes with disapproval the failure of counsel for the appellee to file a brief and an appendix which might have facilitated our consideration of this appeal.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Russell

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 20, 1967
371 F.2d 1016 (3d Cir. 1967)
Case details for

United States v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Edward C. BEHM, Appellant, v. Harry E…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 1967

Citations

371 F.2d 1016 (3d Cir. 1967)