From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rundle

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 30, 1967
384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 16724.

Submitted October 16, 1967.

Decided October 30, 1967.

Francis O'Halloran, pro se.

Alan J. Davis, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Division, Philadelphia, Pa. Charles A. Haddad, Asst. Dist. Atty., Richard A. Sprague, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Arlen Specter, Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief, for appellee.

Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


This is an appeal by a state prisoner from a judgment denying him a writ of habeas corpus.

In the circumstances of this case, we rule that the taking of the appellant's fingerprints in open court, over his objection, was not a denial of fair trial or inconsistent with due process of law. No other point of substance is properly before us on this appeal.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Rundle

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 30, 1967
384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967)
Case details for

United States v. Rundle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Francis O'HALLORAN, Appellant, v. Alfred…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 30, 1967

Citations

384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

United States v. Peters

Fingerprints may be taken in the presence of the jury. United States v. Rundle, 384 F.2d 997 (3d Cir. 1967).…

United States v. Doremus

It has been held, for example, that the taking of a defendant's fingerprints in open court over his objection…