From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rundle

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 21, 1968
389 F.2d 1006 (3d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 17000.

Submitted on Briefs March 4, 1968.

Decided March 21, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Alfred L. Luongo, Judge, 270 F. Supp. 819.

Adam Stamm, pro se.

Arthur Ed. Saylor, First Asst. Dist. Atty., County of Berks, Reading, Pa. (Robert L. VanHoove, Dist. Atty., Reading, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HASTIE, Chief Judge and SEITZ and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


This is an appeal by a state prisoner, serving a life term on a murder conviction, from the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus.

The carefully reasoned opinion of the District Court, entered after an evidentiary hearing on certain controverted issues, considers and properly disposes of each significant contention of the petition.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Rundle

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 21, 1968
389 F.2d 1006 (3d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

United States v. Rundle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Adam STAMM, H-1137, Appellant, v. Alfred…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 21, 1968

Citations

389 F.2d 1006 (3d Cir. 1968)