From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
NO. 1:12-CR-170 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1:12-CR-170 LJO

07-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PEDRO RUIZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #091175 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant PEDRO RUIZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #091175

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

PEDRO RUIZ

INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER OF CASE

FROM FRESNO DIVISION TO SACRAMENTO

DIVISION


Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that this case be transferred from the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division to the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division.

The reason for this request is that the matter was improperly calendared in the Fresno Division due to an error in mailing by the transferring jurisdiction. The case originated in the District of Nebraska, United States v. Pedro Solis Ruiz, Jr., USDC NE 8:11CR44. On March 2, 2011, counsel for defendant was appointed. The case was negotiated and parties represented by attorneys in the Sacramento Division: AUSA Todd Leras and AFD Dennis Waks. Mr. Ruiz requested that the matter proceed pursuant to Rule 20, that the matter be transferred to the Eastern District of California. Subsequently, on May 25, 2012, the consent to transfer jurisdiction was signed and the case transmitted to the Eastern District of California. No division was specified in the request and the clerk of the court in the District of Nebraska sent the matter to Fresno. The matter was placed on calendar in the Fresno Division pursuant to the transfer documents.

It is hereby requested that the matter be transferred from the Fresno Division to the Sacramento Division. The case should have originally been transferred to the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. Attorneys for the parties are located in that division and they fully expected the Rule 20 to proceed in that Division. It would conserve court resources to have the matter transferred without an appearance by the defendant in this district.

It is also requested that the matter be set for status conference on July 24, 2012, at 2:00 pm in the Sacramento Division before the duty magistrate.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

FRANCINE ZEPEDA

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

PEDRO RUIZ

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 18, 2012
NO. 1:12-CR-170 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ruiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PEDRO RUIZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

NO. 1:12-CR-170 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2012)