From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Mag. 11-0043 GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Mag. 11-0043 GGH

09-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS RUIZ, Defendant.

TODD D. LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney JEFFREY STANIELS Attorney for Defendant JESUS RUIZ


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY

HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Todd D. Leras, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey Staniels, Counsel for Defendant Jesus Ruiz, that the preliminary hearing scheduled for September 16, 2011, be continued to October 28, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.

Both parties contemplate a pre-indictment resolution of this matter. Counsel for the parties have been exchanging information in an effort to reach an appropriate disposition of the case. In light of these efforts and the need for additional investigation, both parties are requesting additional time for attorney preparation.

The government and defendant agree that the combination of settlement discussions and continuing investigation constitute good cause to extend the time for preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d), as well as under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). This exclusion of time includes the period up to and including October 28, 2011.

Jeffrey Staniels agrees to this request and has authorized Assistant United States Attorney Todd D. Leras to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

TODD D. LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JEFFREY STANIELS

Attorney for Defendant

JESUS RUIZ

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The preliminary hearing set for September 16, 2011 is continued to October 28, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.

2. Based on the stipulations and representations of the parties, the Court finds good cause to extend the time for the preliminary hearing, and time is excluded up to and including September 16, 2011. (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Mag. 11-0043 GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Ruiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS RUIZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Mag. 11-0043 GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)