From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rublowitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 23, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA)

01-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEAN RUBLOWITZ

JONATHAN ROMANKOW Assistant U.S. Attorney AIDAN P. O'CONNOR, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Sean Rublowitz


Honorable Douglas Arpert


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having been opened to the Court by Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Jonathan W. Romankow, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant SEAN RUBLOW1TZ (Aidan P. O'Connor, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and three continuances having previously been granted; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter presented to a Grand Jury within thirty (30) days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. ' 3161; and the defendant through his attorney having waived such rights and consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. Plea negotiations currently are in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to enter a plea in Court, which would thereby render trial of this matter unnecessary.
2. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance.
3. The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources.
4. Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this 23rd day of January, 2013;

ORDERED that the proceedings in the above-captioned matter are continued from January 11, 2013 through March 12. 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that the period between from January 11, 2013 through March 12, 2013 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

___________

HON. DOUGLAS ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
___________
JONATHAN ROMANKOW
Assistant U.S. Attorney
___________
AIDAN P. O'CONNOR, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant Sean Rublowitz


Summaries of

United States v. Rublowitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 23, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rublowitz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEAN RUBLOWITZ

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2013)