From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rublowitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 28, 2012
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA)

08-28-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUSTIN RUBLOWITZ

JONATHAN ROMANKOW Assistant U.S. Attorney JAMES R. MURPHY, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Justin Rublowitz


Honorable Douglas Arperr


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having been opened to the Court by Paul J, Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Jonathan W. Romankow, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant JUSTIN RUBLOWITZ (James R. Murphy, Esq., appearing), for m order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and one continuance having previously been granted, and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter presented to a Grand Jury within thirty (30) days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161; and the defendant through his attorney having waived such rights and consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. Plea negotiations currently are in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to enter a plea in Court, which would thereby render trial of this matter unnecessary.
2. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance.
3. The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources.
4 Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this ___ day of ___, 2012:

ORDERED that the proceedings in the above-captioned matter are continued from September 14, 2012 through November 13, 2012; and it is further

ORDERED that the period between from September 14, 2012 through November 13, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Thai Act of 1974.

______________

HON. DOUGLAS ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
______________
JONATHAN ROMANKOW
Assistant U.S. Attorney
______________
JAMES R. MURPHY, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant Justin Rublowitz


Summaries of

United States v. Rublowitz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 28, 2012
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Rublowitz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JUSTIN RUBLOWITZ

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Aug. 28, 2012)