From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ross

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
No. 12-8132 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-8132

04-02-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAZEL L. ROSS, Defendant - Appellant.

Hazel L. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hazel L. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hazel L. Ross appeals the district court's order denying her second motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Ross

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
No. 12-8132 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAZEL L. ROSS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

No. 12-8132 (4th Cir. Apr. 2, 2013)