From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ross

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 29, 2023
Criminal Action 3:21-cr-00039-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2023)

Opinion

Criminal Action 3:21-cr-00039-TES-CHW

03-29-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ALBERT ROSS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DECLARE CASE COMPLEX AND TO CONTINUE TRIAL IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Before the Court is the Government's Unopposed Motion to Declare Case Complex [Doc. 441] pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B). The Government also seeks an unopposed continuance of this case until the Court October 2023 Trial Term. [Doc. 441, pp. 1, 3]. According to the Government's motion, “[t]his case involves a long-term electronic surveillance investigation in which thousands of wire and electronic communications were intercepted” leading to over 100 search warrants for “the seizure of cellular telephone data” and “other electronically stored records.” [Id. at p. 2].

Upon consideration of the Indictment [Doc. 1] and the Superseding Indictment [Doc. 272] and for the reasons stated in the Government's motion, the Court concludes that “[t]his case is ‘so unusual, or so complex, due to the number of defendants [and] the nature of the prosecution . . . that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself within the time limits established by [the Speedy Trial Act].'” [Id. at p. 3 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii))]. Thus, the ends of justice served by the granting of a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Government's Unopposed Motion to Declare Case Complex [Doc. 441] and CONTINUES this case to its October 2023 Trial Term as to Albert Ross (1); Richard Cornelius (2); Eric Morgan (3); Lonnie Bennett (4); Bernard Wilcox (6); Tamichael Darden (7); Reginald Battle, Sr. (9); Jose Pineda Perez (14); Ranko Lunic (15); Aleksandar Lunic (16); Michelle Alvarado (17); Tanya Aldana (18); Nathaniel Wilkins (19); and Anthony Bernard Grant (20). The delay occasioned by this Order shall be deemed EXCLUDABLE. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ross

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 29, 2023
Criminal Action 3:21-cr-00039-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ALBERT ROSS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Mar 29, 2023

Citations

Criminal Action 3:21-cr-00039-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2023)