From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rosenthal

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
No. CR 12-00756 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-00756 SBA

03-26-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Joshua Rosenthal, Defendant.

TED W. CASSMAN (SBN 98932) ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Joshua Rosenthal


TED W. CASSMAN (SBN 98932)
ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Joshua Rosenthal

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

FOR DEFENDANT JOSHUA

ROSENTHAL

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties of record, with the concurrence of the Probation department, that the sentencing hearing in the above-referenced matter should be continued from May 7, 2013, 2013 to May 17, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. The continuance is necessary to accommodate the schedules of counsel and the Court.

________________________

TED W. CASSMAN,

Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP

________________________

AARON WEGNER,

Asst. U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Based upon the parties' stipulation and for good cause shown, it is so ordered.

________________________

SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Rosenthal

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
No. CR 12-00756 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rosenthal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Joshua Rosenthal, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-00756 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)