From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rose

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2021
21 CR 631-LTS (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21 CR 631-LTS

11-18-2021

UNITED STATES, v. DAVID ROSE, Defendant.


ORDER

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The arraignment and initial pretrial conference are scheduled to take place telephonically in the above captioned case on November 30, 2021 at 12:00PM. To access the call, the parties must dial 888-363-4734, enter the access code 1527005#, and the security code 1022#. (Members of the press and public may call the same number, but will not be permitted to speak during the hearing.) Counsel should adhere to the following rules and guidelines during the conference:

1. Each party should designate a single lawyer to speak on its behalf (including when noting the appearances of other counsel on the telephone).
2. Counsel should dial in from a quiet, stationary, non-public location, use a landline whenever possible, use a headset instead of a speakerphone, and mute themselves whenever they are not speaking, to minimize background noise and service interruptions. In addition, counsel should not use voice-activated systems that do not allow the user to know when someone else is trying to speak at the same time.
3. To facilitate an orderly teleconference and the creation of an accurate transcript, counsel are required to identify themselves every time they speak. Counsel should spell any proper names for the court reporter. Counsel should also take special care not to interrupt or speak over one another.
4. If there is a beep or chime indicating that a new caller has joined while counsel is speaking, counsel should pause to allow the Court to ascertain the identity of the new participant and confirm that the court reporter has not been dropped from the call.

Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. See Standing Order M-10-468, No. 21-MC-45 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2021). Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

If possible, defense counsel shall discuss the attached Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding with the Defendant prior to the proceeding. If the Defendant consents, and is able to sign the form (either personally or, in accordance with Standing Order 20-MC-174 of March 27, 2020, by defense counsel), defense counsel shall file the executed form at least 24 hours prior to the proceeding. In the event the Defendant consents, but counsel is unable to obtain or affix the Defendant's signature on the form, the Court will conduct an inquiry at the outset of the proceeding to determine whether it is appropriate for the Court to add the Defendant's signature to the form.

SO ORDERED.

WAIVER OF RIGHT TO BE PRESENT AT CRIMINAL PROCEEDING

Check Proceeding that Applies

Arraignment

I have been given a copy of the indictment containing the charges against me and have reviewed it with my attorney. I understand that I have a right to appear before a judge in a courtroom in the Southern District of New York to confirm that I have received and reviewed the indictment; to have the indictment read aloud to me if I wish; and to enter a plea of either guilty or not guilty before the judge. After consultation with my attorney, I wish to plead not guilty. By signing this document, I wish to advise the court of the following. I willingly give up my right to appear in a courtroom in the Southern District of New York to advise the court that:

1) I have received and reviewed a copy of the indictment.
2) I do not need the judge to read the indictment aloud to me.
3) I plead not guilty to the charges against me in the indictment.

Dated:

Signature of Defendant

Print Name

Addendum for a defendant who requires services of an interpreter:

I used the services of an interpreter to discuss these issues with the defendant. The interpreter also translated this document, in its entirety, to the defendant before the defendant signed it. The interpreter's name is:

Dated:

Signature of Defense Counsel


Summaries of

United States v. Rose

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 18, 2021
21 CR 631-LTS (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, v. DAVID ROSE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

21 CR 631-LTS (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2021)