From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roque

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 27, 2012
Crim. No. 12-540 (KM) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. No. 12-540 (KM)

08-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FELIX ROQUE and JOSEPH ROQUE, a/k/a "Maria Pasquale" a/k/a "Jeffery Reyncsc"

BARBARA R. LLANES Assistant U.S. Attorney BRYAN BLANEY, ESQ. Counsel for defendant Felix Rogue JOHN AZZARELLO, ESQ. Counsel for defendant Joseph Rogue


Hon. Kevin McNulty


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Barbara R. Llanes, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendants Felix Roque (Bryan Blaney, Esq., counsel for defendant, appearing) and Joseph Roque (John Azzarello, Esq., counsel for defendant, appearing) for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-capticned matter for a period of 30 days; and the defendants being aware that they have the right to have the matter brought to trial within 70 days of the date of their appearance before a judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(c)(1), and defendants having consented to such a continuance, and it appearing that the defendants waive such right, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The charges in this case are the result of an extensive investigation, and the discovery involves documents and recordings that defense counsel require adequate time to review;

(2) Taking into account the exercise of diligence, therefore, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be permitted a reasonable amount of additional time for effective preparation in this matter;

(3) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this ___ day of August, 2012,

ORDERED that pre-trial motions shall be filed by

October 5, 2012; oppositions shall be filed by October 19, 2012; replies shall be filed by October 26, 2012; a hearing on the motions is scheduled for November 1, 2012; and the trial is scheduled for ______________.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued for a period of 30 days from the date of this order, and that this 30-day period shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

______________

HON. KEVIN MCNULTY

United States District Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
______________
BARBARA R. LLANES
Assistant U.S. Attorney
______________
BRYAN BLANEY, ESQ.
Counsel for defendant Felix Rogue
______________
JOHN AZZARELLO, ESQ.
Counsel for defendant Joseph Rogue


Summaries of

United States v. Roque

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 27, 2012
Crim. No. 12-540 (KM) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Roque

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FELIX ROQUE and JOSEPH ROQUE, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

Crim. No. 12-540 (KM) (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012)