From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roohani

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 26, 2023
2:17-CR-00260-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-CR-00260-JAD-VCF

10-26-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EHSAN ROOHANI, Defendant.

GARY M. RESTAINO UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PITARO & FUMO, CHTD. MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PATRICK CHAPMAN, ESQ. ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY


GARY M. RESTAINO

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

PITARO & FUMO, CHTD.

MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ. COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

PATRICK CHAPMAN, ESQ.

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

STIPUALTION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Patrick Chapman, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Arizona, counsel for the United States (hereinafter “the Government”), and Michael J. Miceli, Esq., counsel for defendant EHSAN ROOHANI (collectively, “the Parties”), that the revocation hearing scheduled for October 31, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., be vacated to a date and time convenient to the court, but no sooner than 30 days from the date of this filing.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.
2. Counsel for ROOHANI, needs additional time to prepare for revocation hearing.
3. Counsel has spoken to Defendant and he has no opposition to the continuance.
4. Counsel has spoken to the Government and they have no opposition to the continuance.
5. The parties agree to the continuance.
6. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively prepare for revocation hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
7. Denial of this request for continuance would deny counsel for sufficient time to effectively represent the defendant.

This is the first Stipulation to continue the revocation hearing and related dates in this matter.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.
2. Counsel for ROOHANI, needs additional time to prepare for revocation hearing.
3. Counsel has spoken to Defendant and he has no opposition to the continuance.
4. Counsel has spoken to the Government and they have no opposition to the continuance.
5. The parties agree to the continuance.
6. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively prepare for revocation hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
7. Denial of this request for continuance would deny counsel for sufficient time to effectively represent the defendant.

This is the first Stipulation to continue the revocation hearing and related dates in this matter.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the revocation hearing currently set for Ocotber 31, 2023 at 11:00 a.m., is vacated and continued to December 4, 2023, at 11:00 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Roohani

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 26, 2023
2:17-CR-00260-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Roohani

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EHSAN ROOHANI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 26, 2023

Citations

2:17-CR-00260-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)