From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Romo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB

10-27-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROMO, Defendant.

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C. Attorney for Defendant DAVID ROMO


JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

Attorney for Defendant

DAVID ROMO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE


Ctrm: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through undersigned counsel, Russell L. Carlberg, Assistant United States Attorney, and Joseph J. Wiseman, attorney for DAVID ROMO, that the status conference presently set for October 28, 2011 be continued to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

Specifically, counsel has been informed that the Government will file a Superseding Indictment and will providing an additional seven boxes of discovery for review. The defendant and his counsel need additional time to review the implications of the new charges and discovery.

Therefore, the parties, the United States of America and the defendant, hereby agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare, review the forensic examination, discuss plea agreement and possible resolution with government, and analyze how best to proceed with the case) from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 28, 2011, to and including December 9, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

By: Joseph J. Wiseman

Attorney for Defendant

David Romo

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Russell L. Carlberg

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for the United States

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403 WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106

Davis, California 95618

Telephone: 530.759.0700

Facsimile: 530.759.0800

Attorney for Defendant

DAVID ROMO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ROMO, Defendant.

Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Date: December 9, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Ctrm: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the status conference presently set for October 28, 2011 be continued to December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

I find that the ends of justice warrant an exclusion of time and that the defendant's need for a reasonable time for effective preparation exceeds the public interest in a trial within 70 days. THEREFORE IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 from the date of this order to December 9, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Romo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 27, 2011
Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Romo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROMO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

Case No. CR.S. 2:11 0209 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)