From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Romo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:11-cr-00209-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:11-cr-00209-KJM 2:22-mc-00261-KJM-JDP

11-02-2022

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. David Romo, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. David Romo, Debtor. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (and its Successors and Assignees) Garnishee.


RELATED CASE ORDER the miscellaneous case, the United States seeks to enforce the restitution order imposed against David Romo in the criminal case. Assignment of these cases to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge will avoid a duplication of efforts. The actions above are thus related, and both actions above will thus remain assigned to Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Case No. 22-261 will remain assigned to Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson.

The parties are reminded that relating cases under Rule 123 causes the actions to be assigned to the same judge-it does not consolidate the actions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Romo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:11-cr-00209-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Romo

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. David Romo, Defendant. United…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

2:11-cr-00209-KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)