Opinion
11-60087-CR-SEITZ
05-25-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOZNAI ROMELUS, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION
PATRICIA A. SEITZ UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant, Boznai Romelus' Motion for “Service of Process” or “Duty to Mitigating Act” by Invoking the “Negligence Official(s)” Secretive Act (“SOSSA”) [DE 76], which the Court interprets as an In Forma Pauperis Motion. In 2012, after serving close to twenty-two months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release, the Defendant completed his criminal sentence in this matter. On November 1, 2021, the Defendant filed a separate civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 assigned Case No. 21-CV-62266-RKA.
In Defendant's motion, the case is styled “Manetirony Clervrain, et al Boznai Romelus v. United States of America.” Defendant refers to himself as “Manetirony Clervrain, ”
Defendant seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this criminal matter. His motion is largely unintelligible and nonsensical. To the extent Defendant seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court determines that this matter is not taken in good faith, given the fact that the time to appeal his 2011 conviction has passed, and the Defendant was released from federal custody almost ten years ago. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). After careful review, the Motion is denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
The 57-page Motion is rambling and incoherent. As such, the Court is unable to discern what other relief, if any, Mr. Romelus is requesting. Therefore, to the extent he seeks any additional relief, such requests are denied.
1. Defendant's In Forma Pauperisation [DE 76] is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED