From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez-Albir

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2015
612 F. App'x 783 (5th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-40043

08-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-ALBIR, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Elvir, Defendant-Appellant


Summary Calendar Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:11-CR-222-1
Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Oscar Rodriguez-Albir appeals the district court's reimposition of a $100 special assessment after the court revoked his supervised release. A review of the revocation hearing transcript reveals that the district court made no findings as to whether Rodriguez-Albir satisfied the special assessment imposed at his original sentencing and did not orally reimpose the special assessment. Thus, as the Government concedes, there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written judgment, and the oral pronouncement controls. See United States v. Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we VACATE IN PART and REMAND for the district court to delete the reimposition of the $100 special assessment from the written judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez-Albir

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2015
612 F. App'x 783 (5th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez-Albir

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSCAR RODRIGUEZ-ALBIR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

612 F. App'x 783 (5th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brown

But these unpublished summary opinions are not binding, nor are they persuasive. See United States v.…