From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 28, 2023
2:22-mj-00864-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-mj-00864-NJK

08-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ ET AL., Defendants.

GABRIEL L. GRASSO, P.C. GABRIEL L. GRASSO, ESQ. Counsel for Louis Daniel Rodriguez RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender JOANNE L. DIAMOND Assistant Federal Public Defender JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney EDWARD G. VERDONA Assistant United States Attorney


GABRIEL L. GRASSO, P.C.

GABRIEL L. GRASSO, ESQ.

Counsel for Louis Daniel Rodriguez

RENE L. VALLADARES

Federal Public Defender

JOANNE L. DIAMOND

Assistant Federal Public Defender

JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

EDWARD G. VERDONA

Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION DATE

(SIXTH REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, District of Nevada, and Edward G. Veronda Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Joanne L. Diamond, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Josue Abraham Reynosa Ochoa, and Gabriel L. Grasso, Esq, counsel for Louis Daniel Rodriguez, that the Preliminary Examination hearing currently scheduled for August 31, 2022 at 4:00 p.m., be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this court but no sooner than sixty (60) days.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties require additional time to discuss the potential for Pre-Indictment negotiations.
2. Counsel for Rodriguez is new to the case and has only recently received portions of the pre-indictment discovery.
3. Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Reynosa-Ochoa are out of custody and agree to the continuance.
4. The parties agree to the continuance.
5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.
6. Denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.
7. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the sixth request for a continuance of the preliminary hearing date in this case.

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Preliminary Examination hearing currently scheduled for August 31st, 2023, at 4:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to Tuesday, October 31, 2023, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3C.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 28, 2023
2:22-mj-00864-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 28, 2023

Citations

2:22-mj-00864-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 28, 2023)