From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rocha-Vasquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00272 AWI (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cr-00272 AWI

10-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER ROCHA-VASQUEZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: October 12, 2011 JEREMY JEHANGIRI Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JAVIER ROCHA-VASQUEZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

JAVIER ROCHA-VASQUEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING

JUDGE: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for October 24, 2011, may be continued to January 23, 2012 at 9:00 A.M.

This continuance is at the request of defense counsel to allow time for proper preparation of the case. Defense counsel has been able to view the forensic evidence at the FBI office. We are now seeking to retain an out of state expert to test and evaluate Mr. Rocha. Defense would like to have this report completed before entering into plea negotiations with the government. The requested continuance will serve the ends of justice and result in economic use of time and resources and will conserve time and resources for all parties and the court. The defense is requesting the amount of time it is because the experts are located in Pennsylvania and Minnesota and the coordination of schedules will be time consuming.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and for plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DATED: October 12, 2011

JEREMY JEHANGIRI

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JAVIER ROCHA-VASQUEZ

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ____


Summaries of

United States v. Rocha-Vasquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 12, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00272 AWI (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Rocha-Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER ROCHA-VASQUEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cr-00272 AWI (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)