From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rocha-Miranda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 19, 2015
604 F. App'x 566 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-10083 No. 14-10084

05-19-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JULIO OMAR ROCHA-MIRANDA, a.k.a. Julio O. Rocha Miranda, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01315-RCC 4:10-cr-02852-RCC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Kimberly A. Moore, Circuit Judge, Presiding
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Kimberly A. Moore, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

In these consolidated appeals, Julio Omar Rocha-Miranda appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and 9-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rocha-Miranda's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rocha-Miranda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rocha-Miranda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 19, 2015
604 F. App'x 566 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Rocha-Miranda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JULIO OMAR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 19, 2015

Citations

604 F. App'x 566 (9th Cir. 2015)