From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Jan 14, 2014
CASE NO. 06-20286-CR-GOLD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 06-20286-CR-GOLD/GOODMAN

01-14-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS R. ROBLES, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS [ECF No. 186];

DENYING MOTION FOR RESTITUTION CREDIT [ECF No. 180]

This CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman's Report and Recommendations [ECF No. 186] on Defendant Louis Robles' Motion for Restitution Credit [ECF No. 180]. Robles filed Objections [ECF No. 187] to the Report. Having conducted a de novo review of the Report, I adopt and affirm the Report and deny Robles' Motion.

I concur with Magistrate Judge Goodman that the Judgment [ECF No. 143] does not prohibit the Government from pursuing collection efforts independent of the restitution payment schedule set forth therein. Nor does the Judgment provide that Robles' payment of the instant $4,953.46 excuses or satisfies Robles' obligation to make payments from wages earned while he is incarcerated.

Further, I concur with Judge Goodman that the statutory scheme and interpreting case law governing restitution payments permit the Government to collect the instant $4,953.46 without affecting Robles' scheduled payments. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(A) (permitting government to enforce an order of restitution "by all other available and reasonable means"); United States v. Schwartz, 2011 WL 1544624 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 14, 2011) (concluding UNICOR payment schedule set forth in judgment did not prohibit garnishment during incarceration); United States v. James, 312 F. Supp. 2d 802, 806 (E.D. Va. 2004) (existence of payment schedule in restitution order "does not mean that the government is precluded from pursuing other avenues of ensuring that defendant's restitution obligation is satisfied"). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that 1. The Report and Recommendations [ECF No. 186] is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant Louis Robles' Motion for Restitution Credit [ECF No. 180] is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 14th day of January, 2014.

___________________________

THE HONORABLE ALAN S. GOLD

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
cc: Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman

Counsel of record

Louis S. Robles

# 64900-004

Federal Satellite Camp

2650 HWY 301 South

Jesup, GA 31599


Summaries of

United States v. Robles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Jan 14, 2014
CASE NO. 06-20286-CR-GOLD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Robles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS R. ROBLES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 14, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 06-20286-CR-GOLD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Quam

Accordingly, garnishment of Quam's retirement funds does not interrupt Quam's monthly obligations pursuant to…