From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robles

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2022
2:22-cr-00154-APG-BNW-1 (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cr-00154-APG-BNW-1

10-24-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MANUEL ROBLES, Defendant.

RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender JACQUELYN N. WITT Assistant Federal Public Defender JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney ROBERT KNIEF Assistant United States Attorney


RENE L. VALLADARES

Federal Public Defender

JACQUELYN N. WITT

Assistant Federal Public Defender

JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

ROBERT KNIEF

Assistant United States Attorney

(Second Request)

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTION DEADLINES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Robert Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Jacquelyn N. Witt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Jose Manuel Robles, that the previously ordered deadline for filing of pretrial motions be vacated and that the parties herein shall have to and including December 22, 2022, within which to file the Defendant's pretrial motions currently due October 23, 2022.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including January 5, 2023, to file any and all responsive pleadings, currently due November 6, 2022.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including January 12, 2023, to file any and all replies to dispositive motions, currently due November 13, 2022.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Since the last stipulation was filed the government produced discovery, and discovery was reviewed by defense counsel.
2. Defense counsel needs additional time to thoroughly review discovery materials and discuss this case with Mr. Robles.
3. Defense counsel needs additional time to conduct additional investigation, if necessary.
4. Mr. Robles is in custody and does not object to the continuance.
5. The parties agree to the continuance.
6. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.
7. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the second stipulation to continue filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Since the last stipulation was filed the government produced discovery, and discovery was reviewed by defense counsel.
2. Defense counsel needs additional time to thoroughly review discovery materials and discuss this case with Mr. Robles.
3. Defense counsel needs additional time to conduct additional investigation, if necessary.
4. Mr. Robles is in custody and does not object to the continuance.
5. The parties agree to the continuance.
6. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.
7. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act Title 18 United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A),
considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties herein shall have to and including December 22, 2022 within which to file the Defendant's pretrial motions.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including January 5, 2023 to file any and all responsive pleadings.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, that they shall have to and including January 12, 2023 to file any and all replies to dispositive motions.


Summaries of

United States v. Robles

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2022
2:22-cr-00154-APG-BNW-1 (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Robles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MANUEL ROBLES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

2:22-cr-00154-APG-BNW-1 (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)