Opinion
Crim. Action 2:21-CR-29
06-29-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN JAY ROBINSON, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE [ECF NO. 23], ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING
THOMAS S. KLEEH, CHIEF JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
On June 7, 2022, the Defendant, Austin Jay Robinson (“Robinson”), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Counts One and Two of the Indictment, charging him in both counts with Distribution of Methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). Robinson stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and Robinson consented to pleading before the magistrate judge.
This Court referred Robinson's plea of guilty to the magistrate judge for the purpose of administering the allocution, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.
Based upon Robinson's statements during the plea hearing, and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Robinson was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that Robinson understood the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case (“R&R”) [ECF No. 23] finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Robinson's plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the Indictment.
The magistrate judge remanded Robinson to the custody of the United States Marshals Service.
The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither Robinson nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.
Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [ECF No. 23], provisionally ACCEPTS Robinson's guilty plea, and 2 ADJUDGES him GUILTY of the crimes charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment.
Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS the following:
1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Robinson, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;
2. The Government and Robinson shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by July 5, 2022;
3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Robinson, his counsel, and the Government on or before August 19, 2022; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);
4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before September 2, 2022;
5. Counsel's responses to objections to the presentence investigation report shall be filed on or before September 9, 2022;
6. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before September 30, 2022; and
7. Counsel may file any written sentencing memoranda or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before October 14, 2022.
The Court further ORDERS that prior to sentencing, Robinson's counsel shall review with him the revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions adopted by this Court on November 29, 2016, pursuant to the standing order entered by Chief Judge Groh, In Re: Revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions, 3:16-MC-56.
The Court will conduct the Sentencing Hearing for Robinson on November 3, 2022, at 12:30 p.m., at the Elkins, West Virginia, point of holding court. If counsel anticipates having multiple witnesses or an otherwise lengthy sentencing hearing, please notify the Judge's chamber staff so that an adequate amount of time can be scheduled.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies.