From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
1:97-cr-05129-JLT-3 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:97-cr-05129-JLT-3

06-13-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LAWRENCE ROBINSON, Defendant-Movant.


ORDER STAYING CASE

(DOC. 437)

On June 29, 2021, the previously assigned district judge denied Lawrence Robinson's motions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 436.) On July 8, 2021, Defendant requested reconsideration of denial of a certificate of appealability, citing to the pending case of United States v. Taylor, No. 20-1459 (certiorari granted July 2, 2021), which remains pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. (Doc. 437.) Defendant also requested the Court stay the instant case pending a determination by the Supreme Court in Taylor. (Id. at 1-2.) A routine review of the docket of this case reveals that the Court has yet to formally respond to the stay request.

The Court GRANTS Defendant's request to stay this case pending the Supreme Court's resolution in Taylor because the outcome of Taylor may affect the Court's determination regarding the request for reconsideration of the denial of certificate of appealability. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936) (“[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”). In particular, the issue presented in Taylor concerns whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3). The Ninth Circuit previously held that attempted Hobbs Act robbery constituted a crime of violence under the statute. See United States v. Dominguez, 954 F.3d 1251, 1262 (9th Cir. 2020). If the Supreme Court reaches a different conclusion in Taylor, this Court's decision regarding Defendant's motion for reconsideration may be impacted because Defendant's case likewise involves a conviction of aiding and abetting under 18 U.S.C. § 924. (See Doc. 437 at 2.) For these reasons and because the Government did not oppose the request to stay, this case is hereby STAYED. The parties are instructed to file a joint status report within fourteen days of the Supreme Court issuing a final decision in Taylor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Robinson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
1:97-cr-05129-JLT-3 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LAWRENCE ROBINSON…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

1:97-cr-05129-JLT-3 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)