From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Robinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2020
No. 20-6898 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6898

11-24-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN SAKASKI ROBINSON, a/k/a Worm, Defendant - Appellant.

Steven Sakaski Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1) Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Sakaski Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Sakaski Robinson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 32 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Robinson, No. 4:06-cr-01322-TLW-1 (D.S.C. June 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Robinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2020
No. 20-6898 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN SAKASKI…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6898 (4th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020)