From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2022
05-cr-00567-JSW-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2022)

Opinion

05-cr-00567-JSW-1

08-02-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHAUN ROBERTS, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL RE: DKT. NO. 237

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 2113(a) and (d). Those convictions formed the predicate offenses for his Section 924(c) convictions. (See, e.g., Dkt. No. 75 (Verdict Form), Dkt. No. 92 (Judgment).) On July 25, 2022, Defendant filed a pro se motion asking the Court to appoint counsel on his behalf to pursue postconviction relief based on United States v. Taylor, in which the Supreme Court held attempted Hobbs Act robbery was not a crime of violence for purposes of Section 924(c), under the elements clause. __ U.S. __, 142 S.Ct. 2015, 2020 (2022). The Court concludes Defendant has not shown that appointment of counsel is warranted and DENIES his request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2022
05-cr-00567-JSW-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHAUN ROBERTS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2022

Citations

05-cr-00567-JSW-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2022)