From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 20, 2021
2:20-mj-00173-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-mj-00173-KJN

08-20-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOE ROBERTS, Defendant.

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, LEXI NEGIN, Attorneys for Defendant JOE ROBERTS.


Hearing Dated: August 20, 2021.

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, LEXI NEGIN, Attorneys for Defendant JOE ROBERTS.

MEMORANDUM TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Mr. Joe Roberts, by and through undersigned counsel, requests that his status hearing set for August 20, 2021, be continued to November 5, 2021, for the following reasons:

1. Mr. Roberts is pending sentencing in the Central District of California [2:13-cr-751-TJH-1.] He was arrested on a warrant in the Eastern District of California and remains detained at the Sacramento County Jail. The case has been transferred to the Central District pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5, but the Court has not issued a transport order at this time on the basis of the Central District Court order described below.

2. The District Court in the Central District, based on the parties stipulation there, has ordered that Mr. Roberts remain in custody in Sacramento so that he can appear remotely for court proceedings in the Central District [2:13-cr-751-TJH-1, Dkt. 487]. The Order reflects that the reason for the Court's order is “logistical issues associated with his transport during the pandemic, made all the more difficult by the fact he is wheelchair-bound, ” and given that he may waive his personal appearance and appear virtually pursuant to the CARES Act, unnecessary transportation presents a risk to his health.

3. On August 16, 2021, the Central District Court continued the sentencing to November 1, 2021, on its own motion [2:13-cr-751-TJH-1, Dkt. 494]. The Attorney for Mr. Roberts in the Central District has informed counsel that the parties there are working toward the sentencing and requests more time for that to be accomplished.

4. The Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of California, Vincenza Rabenn, does not object to this continuance of status based upon the Central District Court's order and the parties' need for more time there.

5. If Mr. Roberts is sentenced prior to November 5, 2021, the parties will vacate this hearing.

Wherefore, it is requested that this Court continue the status hearing currently scheduled for August 20, 2021, be continued to November 5, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.

IT IS SO ORDERED,


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 20, 2021
2:20-mj-00173-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOE ROBERTS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 20, 2021

Citations

2:20-mj-00173-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)