From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 11, 2015
13-CR-061-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2015)

Opinion

          KYLE R. KNAPP, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant MATTHEW ROBERTS.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MATTHEW YELOVICH, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Matthew Yelovich, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, together with Kyle Knapp, attorney for defendant MATTHEW ROBERTS that the previously-scheduled Admit or Deny hearing, currently set for March 12, 2015, be vacated and that the matter be set for said hearing on March 19, 2015 at 9:30 am.

         This continuance is requested because defense counsel is engaged in a Placer County jury trial that is in session on March 12, 2015. The one week continuance is requested as it is believed that the assigned probation officer is unavailable the following day.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         The Stipulation of the parties is hereby accepted and the requested continuance is GRANTED. This matter shall be dropped from this court's March 12, 2015 criminal calendar and re-calendared for an Admit or Deny Hearing on March 19, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 11, 2015
13-CR-061-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW ROBERTS. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 11, 2015

Citations

13-CR-061-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2015)