From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roberts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 19, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 1:10-CR-247 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:10-CR-247

04-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLEN ROBERTS, JR.


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the motions to suppress (Docs. 43, 111, 112), the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution (Doc. 136) and the motion for disclosure of confidential informant (Doc. 144) filed by defendant Allen Roberts, Jr. ("Roberts"), and it appearing that on December 16, 2011, Roberts entered a plea of guilty to count four of the superseding indictment (Doc. 117) pursuant to a binding plea agreement, wherein Roberts and the government stipulated to a term of imprisonment of 60 months and Roberts acknowledged that "the government's position in this litigation was taken in good faith, had substantial basis in law and fact and was not vexatious," (Doc. 185 ¶¶ 9, 19), and it further appearing that the court accepted Roberts' guilty plea and found it to be voluntary (see Doc. 189), and the court finding that "[a] plea of guilty is a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses and constitutes an admission of guilt," United States v. Ptomey, 366 F.2d 759, 760 (3d Cir. 1966); see also United States v. Tamburro, 97 Fed. App'x 378, 380 (3d Cir. 2004) ('When a criminal defendant has solemnly admitted in open court that he is in fact guilty of the offense with which he is charged, he may not thereafter raise independent claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea.' (quoting Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973))), and the court concluding that the issues raised by Roberts' motions are waived as the result of his guilty plea, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions to suppress (Docs. 43, 111, 112), the motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution (Doc. 136), and the motion for disclosure of confidential informant (Doc. 144) are DENIED as moot.

___________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Roberts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 19, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 1:10-CR-247 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLEN ROBERTS, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 19, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:10-CR-247 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 19, 2012)