From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rivera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cr-00074-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cr-00074-APG-DJA

01-27-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RIVERA ET AL, Defendant.

RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney JOANNE L. DIAMOND Assistant Federal Public Defender EDWARD G. VERONDA Assistant United States Attorney KENDALL S. STONE Counsel for Moses Rivera


RENE L. VALLADARES

Federal Public Defender

JASON M. FRIERSON

United States Attorney

JOANNE L. DIAMOND

Assistant Federal Public Defender

EDWARD G. VERONDA

Assistant United States Attorney

KENDALL S. STONE

Counsel for Moses Rivera

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATES

(THIRD REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between, Jason M. Frierson, United States Attorney, and Edward G. Veronda, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, Joanne L. Diamond, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Martel Rivera, Jr., and Kendall S. Stone, counsel for Moses Rivera that the calendar call currently scheduled for February 21, 2023, and the trial scheduled for February 27, 2023, be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court, but no sooner than sixty (60) days.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the defendants need additional time to conduct investigation in this case in order to determine whether there are any pretrial issues that must be litigated and whether the case will ultimately go to trial or will be resolved through negotiations.

2. Martel Rivera, Jr. is out of custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. Moses Rivera is in custody and does not object to the continuance.

4. The parties agree to the continuance.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.

6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

This is the third stipulation to continue filed herein.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the defendants need additional time to conduct investigation in this case in order to determine whether there are any pretrial issues that must be litigated and whether the case will ultimately go to trial or will be resolved through negotiations.

2. Martel Rivera, Jr. is out of custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. Moses Rivera is in custody and does not object to the continuance

4. The parties agree to the continuance.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.

6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section § 3161 (h)(7)(A), when the considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, proposed jury instructions, and a list of the Government's prospective witnesses must be electronically submitted to the Court by the 2nd day of May, 2023, by the hour of 12:00 p.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the calendar call currently scheduled for February 21, 2023, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to May 2, 2023 at the hour of 9:00 a.m.; and the trial currently scheduled for February 27, 2023, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to May 8, 2023 at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.


Summaries of

United States v. Rivera

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cr-00074-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RIVERA ET AL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 27, 2023

Citations

2:22-cr-00074-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)