From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rios-Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 30, 2012
Case No. 09-20119-14-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 09-20119-14-JWL Case No. 12-2422-JWL

10-30-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff / Respondent, v. JESUS RIOS-MENDOZA Defendant / Petitioner.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By Memorandum and Order of October 16, 2012, this Court denied defendant's pro se petition to modify his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant has now filed a pro se motion for reconsideration of that order (Doc. # 1008). The Court summarily denies that motion for reconsideration.

Defendant argues that the Court incorrectly stated that he made four trips with drugs, when in fact three of those trips involves the transportation of money, not drugs. Actually, the Court correctly stated in its order that defendant had helped to transport "drugs or drug proceeds" on four occasions. Similarly, a quantity of drugs was attributed to defendant for all four trips because they involved drugs or drug proceeds. Finally, defendant complains of a long sentence, but he has not asserted any claim that would make the ten-year mandatory minimum sentence inapplicable to his offense. Defendant has not shown that the Court erred in denying his claim that his counsel was ineffective in failing to argue for a minimal- or minor-participant deduction; accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 30th day of October, 2012, in Kansas City, Kansas.

_________________

John W. Lungstrum

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Rios-Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 30, 2012
Case No. 09-20119-14-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Rios-Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff / Respondent, v. JESUS RIOS-MENDOZA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

Case No. 09-20119-14-JWL (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2012)