From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rigmaiden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 30, 2012
No. CR08-0814-01-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR08-0814-01-PHX-DGC

01-30-2012

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel David Rigmaiden (1), Defendant.


ORDER

The Court held a status conference with the parties on January 27, 2012. Among other matters, the following items were resolved.

1. The government clarified its concession with respect to a Fourth Amendment search. The government will concede that the actions it took during the air card locating mission were sufficiently intrusive to constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment, but reserves its right to argue that Defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the places or items searched. As a result of this concession, Defendant will not need to prove intrusiveness, but will need to address his reasonable expectation of privacy.

2. The Court extended the deadline for Defendant's Fourth Amendment motion to suppress until April 27, 2012. The Court extended the page limit for the motion to 75 pages.

____________

David G. Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Rigmaiden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 30, 2012
No. CR08-0814-01-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Rigmaiden

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Daniel David Rigmaiden (1)…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

No. CR08-0814-01-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2012)