From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Riffe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Mar 31, 2015
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:14-CR-20-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:14-CR-20-5

03-31-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN GREGORY RIFFE, Defendant.


()

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before this Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull [Doc. 123]. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Kaull for submission of a proposed report and a recommendation ("R & R"). Magistrate Judge Kaull filed his R&R on March 2, 2015 [Doc. 123]. In that filing, the magistrate judge recommended that this Court dismiss the Indictment filed in Criminal Action No. 2:14-cr-20 as to defendant Justin Gregory Riffe.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour , 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge Kaull's R & R were due within fourteen (14) days of receipt, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court will review the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review of the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 123] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. Accordingly, this Court hereby DISMISSES the Indictment filed in Criminal Action No. 2:14-cr-20 insofar as it pertains to defendant Justin Gregory Riffe.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record.

DATED: March 31, 2015.

/s/ _________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Riffe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Mar 31, 2015
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:14-CR-20-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Riffe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN GREGORY RIFFE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:14-CR-20-5 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 2015)