From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Richter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 5, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-0518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-0518 MCE

07-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RICHTER, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELLE PRINCE Assistant U.S. Attorney DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Mr. Richter


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

WILLIAM RICHTER

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND

EXCLUDE TIME


Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, William Richter, that the status conference scheduled for July 5, 2012, may be continued to August 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

Defense counsel seeks additional time to perform a forensic review of computer materials seized from Mr. Richter and to evaluate those results. The parties therefore agree that the interests of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the parties in a speedy trial. The parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on August 23, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________

MICHELLE PRINCE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

______________

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Mr. Richter

ORDER

The status conference is continued to August 23, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the reasons stated above and by agreement of the parties, the Court finding that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Richter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 5, 2012
No. 2:11-CR-0518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Richter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RICHTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 5, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-0518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2012)