From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reynoso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:06-CR-0264 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:06-CR-0264 WBS

09-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN REYNOSO, Defendant.

Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for ADRIAN REYNOSO BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney T. Zindel for J. Hitt JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ADRIAN REYNOSO

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Adrian Reynoso, through their respective attorneys, that the status conference scheduled for September 12, 2011, may be continued to November 14, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.

The parties have yet to meet and confer regarding resolution of this case or to review recent medical records that may bear on that resolution. Counsel for Mr. Reynoso will be out on family medical leave for five weeks beginning next week, returning on October 17. In order to assure continuity of defense counsel and to have time to complete their discussions and the parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded through November 14, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for ADRIAN REYNOSO

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

T. Zindel for J. Hitt

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to November 14, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Reynoso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:06-CR-0264 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Reynoso

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN REYNOSO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:06-CR-0264 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)