From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reynos

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Nov 21, 2012
700 F.3d 690 (3d Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11–1398.

2012-11-21

UNITED STATES of America v. Quintrell REYNOS, Appellant.

Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Joseph T. Labrum, III, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America. William J. Winning, Esq., Megan S. Scheib, Esq., Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.


Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Joseph T. Labrum, III, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America. William J. Winning, Esq., Megan S. Scheib, Esq., Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.
Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENWAY, JR., and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon further consideration and argument, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that en banc consideration was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the opinion and judgment entered May 22, 2012 for the above captioned case are hereby reinstated.

By the Court,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

Chief Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Reynos

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Nov 21, 2012
700 F.3d 690 (3d Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Reynos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. Quintrell REYNOS, Appellant.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

700 F.3d 690 (3d Cir. 2012)