Opinion
No. 20-10604
03-09-2022
Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, for Interested Party-Appellant John P. McAvoy. John P. McAvoy, Fairfax, VA, Pro Se. Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, Willie J. Huntley, Jr., The Huntley Firm, PC, Mobile, AL, for Interested Party-Appellant Marco Zavala. Marco Zavala, Holly Spring, NC, Pro Se. Leah Ann Butler, U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama, U.S. Attorney's Office, Mobile, AL, Sarah Carroll, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Jay D. Majors, U.S. Department of Justice, Torts Branch, Civil Division, Charles W. Scarborough, U.S. Attorney General's Office, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America. Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, Willie J. Huntley, Jr., The Huntley Firm, PC, Mobile, AL, for Interested Party-Appellant Murray Farmer. Murray Farmer, Mobile, AL, Pro Se.
Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, for Interested Party-Appellant John P. McAvoy.
John P. McAvoy, Fairfax, VA, Pro Se.
Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, Willie J. Huntley, Jr., The Huntley Firm, PC, Mobile, AL, for Interested Party-Appellant Marco Zavala.
Marco Zavala, Holly Spring, NC, Pro Se.
Leah Ann Butler, U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama, U.S. Attorney's Office, Mobile, AL, Sarah Carroll, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Jay D. Majors, U.S. Department of Justice, Torts Branch, Civil Division, Charles W. Scarborough, U.S. Attorney General's Office, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.
Michael S. Arif, Arif & Associates, PC, Fairfax, VA, Willie J. Huntley, Jr., The Huntley Firm, PC, Mobile, AL, for Interested Party-Appellant Murray Farmer.
Murray Farmer, Mobile, AL, Pro Se.
Before William Pryor, Chief Judge, Wilson, Jordan, Rosenbaum, Jill Pryor, Newsom, Branch, Grant, Luck, Lagoa, and Brasher, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A judge of this Court having requested a poll on whether this appeal should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor, the Court sua sponte ORDERS that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel's opinion is VACATED.