From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rendon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 12, 2022
2:19-CR-00210 (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-CR-00210

12-12-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW RENDON Defendant,

LEVENTHAL & ASSOCIATES, PLLC TODD M. LEVENTHAL Counsel for Defendant Matthew BRIAN WHANG Assistant United States Attorney


LEVENTHAL & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

TODD M. LEVENTHAL Counsel for Defendant Matthew

BRIAN WHANG Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE

(First)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney, and BRIAN WHANG, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and TODD M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ., counsel for MATTHEW RENDON, that the Sentencing date scheduled for January 23, 2023, be vacated, and set to a date and time convenient to this Court, but not sooner than ninety (90) days.

The Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The requested time is not for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete presentencing issues.

This is the first stipulation to continue the sentencing date.

FINDING OF FACT, COCLUSION OF LAW, AND ORDER

(First Request)

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The requested time is not for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete presentencing issues.

This is the first stipulation to continue the sentencing date.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial because the failure to grant it would likely result in a miscarriage of justice. This continuance is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) based on the factors outlined in §161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled for January 23, 2023 at the hour of 2:00 p.m., is vacated and continued to May 3, 2023, at 11:00 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Rendon

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 12, 2022
2:19-CR-00210 (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Rendon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW RENDON Defendant,

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 12, 2022

Citations

2:19-CR-00210 (D. Nev. Dec. 12, 2022)