From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Remigio-Onofre

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 17, 2015
1:08-cr-00124-AWI-8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, KATHLEEN A. SERVATIUS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, DAVID M. PORTER, Assistant Federal Defender, Counsel Designated for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant, ABEL REMIGIO-ONOFRE.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

         Defendant, ABEL REMIGIO-ONOFRE, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen A. Servatius, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On May 3, 2010, this Court sentenced Mr. Remigio-Onofre to a term of 151 months imprisonment;

         3. His total offense level was 31, his criminal history category was IV, and the resulting guideline range was 151 to 188;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Remigio-Onofre was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973, with an effective date of any such reduction as of November 1, 2015;

         5. Mr. Remigio-Onofre's total offense level has been reduced from 31 to 29, and his amended guideline range is 121 to 151 months;

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Remigio-Onofre's term of imprisonment to a total term of 121 months. Respectfully submitted,

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Remigio-Onofre is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 31 to 29, resulting in an amended guideline range of 121 to 151 months.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in May 2010 is reduced to a term of 121 months.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Remigio-Onofre shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Remigio-Onofre

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 17, 2015
1:08-cr-00124-AWI-8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Remigio-Onofre

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ABEL REMIGIO-ONOFRE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

1:08-cr-00124-AWI-8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)