Opinion
No. 12-50320 D.C. No. 3:08-cr-01835-BTM
2013-10-03
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HARRY LEE REDDS, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Harry Lee Redds, Jr., appeals from the district court's judgment revoking supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Redds's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Redds the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
A review of the record indicates that this appeal is moot because Redds's supervised release has again been revoked. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). We accordingly dismiss the appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.