From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reddick

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2022
1:22-cr-00680-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cr-00680-GHW

12-13-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JALAHNI REDDICK, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ALEXANDRA S. MESSITER Assistant United States Attorney JALAHNI REDDICK BENJAMIN ZEMAN, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Zeman & Womble, LLP


DAMIAN WILLIAMS

United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

ALEXANDRA S. MESSITER

Assistant United States Attorney

JALAHNI REDDICK

BENJAMIN ZEMAN, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

Zeman & Womble, LLP

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS, on or about December 13, 2022, JALAHNI REDDICK, (the “Defendant”), was charged in a one count Information, 22 Cr. ____(GHW) (the “Information”), with Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1951 and 2 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from, proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;

WHEREAS, on or about December 13, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States a sum of money equal to $603,865.93 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense alleged in Count One of the Information; 1

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $603,865.93 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with his co-defendants (the “CoDefendants”) to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-Defendants in this case; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Alexandra S. Messiter, of counsel, and the Defendant and his counsel, Benjamin Zeman, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $603,865.93 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the Co-Defendants to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-Defendants in this case, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant JALAHNI 2 REDDICK, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 3

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED. 4


Summaries of

United States v. Reddick

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 13, 2022
1:22-cr-00680-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Reddick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JALAHNI REDDICK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

Citations

1:22-cr-00680-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 13, 2022)