From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Redd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2013
519 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6299

04-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KUNTA KENTA REDD, Defendant - Appellant.

Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00043-D-1; 7:11-cv-00094-D) Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kunta Kenta Redd seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Redd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Redd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2013
519 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Redd

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KUNTA KENTA REDD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

519 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Redd v. Wilson

I. Procedural HistoryRedd was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North…