From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rebollar-Alarcon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 14, 2015
No. 13-10261 (9th Cir. Apr. 14, 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-10261

04-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AURELIO REBOLLAR-ALARCON, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-01934-DGC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Linda R. Reade, District Judge, Presiding
Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

Aurelio Rebollar-Alarcon appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rebollar-Alarcon's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rebollar-Alarcon the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rebollar-Alarcon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 14, 2015
No. 13-10261 (9th Cir. Apr. 14, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Rebollar-Alarcon

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AURELIO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 14, 2015

Citations

No. 13-10261 (9th Cir. Apr. 14, 2015)