From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rayo-Camacho

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 28, 2016
No. 16-10453 (11th Cir. Sep. 28, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-10453

09-28-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO, SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00362-JDW-AEP-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho's conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rayo-Camacho

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sep 28, 2016
No. 16-10453 (11th Cir. Sep. 28, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Rayo-Camacho

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

No. 16-10453 (11th Cir. Sep. 28, 2016)