From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Raymond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
No. CR 13-024 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 13-024 WHA

05-02-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROLAND LEROY RAYMOND, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division DAVID R. CALLAWAY (CABN 121782) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
DAVID R. CALLAWAY (CABN 121782)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff

[PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME


Before The Hon. William H. Alsup

United States District Judge

The parties appeared at the above date and time for what was expected to be a change of plea. Instead, the parties requested to continue the hearing based on indications that Mr. Raymond had recently been under the influence of narcotics. The matter was put over to Tuesday, May 21, 2013, at 2:00 p.m., for a change of plea. The parties agreed, and this Court hereby finds, that the time between April 23, 2013 and May 21, 2013 - a total of 28 days - is properly excluded from the Speedy Trial Clock based on the following grounds: (1) 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) (ends of justice served outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial), and (2) 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (failure to grant continuance would deny the defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation).

Based upon the representations and stipulation of the parties in open court, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the foregoing period is excluded from the computation of the period within which the trial of this matter must commence. The Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the interests of the public and the parties in a speedier trial based upon the grounds set forth above and finds that the time is appropriately excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

______________________________

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Raymond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
No. CR 13-024 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Raymond

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROLAND LEROY RAYMOND, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

No. CR 13-024 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)