From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2020
974 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2020)

Opinion

No. 18-50115 No. 18-50120

09-04-2020

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel RAY, aka Popeye, aka Daniel T. Ray, aka Daniel Thomas Ray, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick John Bacon, Defendant-Appellant.


ORDER

:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that United States v. Bacon , No. 18-50120, be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. The memorandum disposition is vacated with respect to United States v. Bacon , No. 18-50120. The mandate remains in effect with respect to United States v. Ray , No. 18-50115.


Summaries of

United States v. Ray

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2020
974 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANIEL RAY, AKA Popeye…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2020

Citations

974 F.3d 959 (9th Cir. 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bacon

Upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the non-recused active judges, we agreed to rehear this case en…