From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Raoult

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 22, 2023
No. CR21-109RSL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)

Opinion

CR21-109RSL

06-22-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEBASTIEN RAOULT, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DUE DATE

ROBERT S. LASNIK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on defendant's “Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial Motions Deadline.” (Dkt. # 30). Having considered the facts set forth in the motion, and defendant's knowing and voluntary waiver (Dkt. # 32), the Court finds as follows:

1. The Court adopts the facts set forth in the stipulated motion: in particular, that this case involves an alleged international hacking scheme resulting in voluminous and complex discovery proceeding pursuant to a protective order issued by this Court, see Dkt. # 24. Pretrial preparation is further complicated by the fact that defendant primarily speaks French. The Court accordingly finds that a failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel, and any potential future counsel, the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

2. The Court finds that a failure to grant a continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).

3. The Court finds that the additional time requested between the current trial date of January 16, 2024, and the proposed trial date of May 13, 2024, is a reasonable period of delay. The Court finds that this additional time is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time to prepare for trial, as defendant has requested more time to prepare for trial, to continue to investigate the matter, to gather evidence material to the defense, and to consider possible defenses. The additional time requested between the current trial date and the new trial date is necessary to provide counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary to prepare for trial, considering all of the facts set forth above.

4. The Court further finds that this continuance would serve the ends of justice, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedier trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

5. Defendant has signed a waiver indicating that he has been advised of his right to a speedy trial and that, after consulting with counsel, he has knowingly and voluntarily waived that right and consented to the continuation of his trial to a date up to and including July 13, 2024, Dkt. # 32, which will permit his trial to start on May 13, 2024.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date shall be continued from January 16, 2024 to May 13, 2024, and pretrial motions are to be filed no later than March 18, 2024;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the date of this Order, up to and including the new trial date, shall be excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. The period of delay attributable to this filing and granting of this motion is excluded for speedy trial purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(D), (h)(7)(A), and (h)(7)(B).


Summaries of

United States v. Raoult

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 22, 2023
No. CR21-109RSL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Raoult

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEBASTIEN RAOULT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 22, 2023

Citations

No. CR21-109RSL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 22, 2023)