From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rangel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
Case No.: 09-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 09-501 WBS

09-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERARDO RANGEL, et al., Defendants.

JILL THOMAS Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ Attorney for Gerardo Rangel ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Jose Cobian


LEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, SBN 207136

Attorney for Defendant

GERARDO RANGEL

STIPULATION AND ORDER

VACATING DATE, CONTINUING

CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

DATE: September 26, 2011

TIME: 8:30 a.m.

JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jill Thomas, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorneys Clemente M. Jiménez, Counsel for Defendant GERARDO RANGEL, and Erin Radekin, Counsel for Defendant JOSE COBIAN, that the status conference scheduled for September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on October 3, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. The parties are near resolution and defense counsel seeks additional time to confer with Mr. Rangel about recent settlement discussions with the government.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

JILL THOMAS

Attorney for Plaintiff

CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ

Attorney for Gerardo Rangel

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Jose Cobian

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for September 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to October 3, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Rangel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
Case No.: 09-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Rangel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERARDO RANGEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 09-501 WBS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)